Warehouses in Pennsylvania & Ohio

Cambridge Space Heaters vs. Direct Fired Recirculation
Comparative Case Study

Download Case Study PDF

Cambridge Space Heaters

Operating Costs

Based on 5,682 Heating Degree Days @ 65°
$0.17/ft2 Gas cost @ $1.00/therm
$0.02/ft2 Electric cost @ $0.08/kWh

$0.19/ft2 Total cost

Building Specifications

  • R-14 Roof / R-10/R1.5 Walls
  • 579,000 ft2 x 38’ high
  • 88 doors
  • Located in Bethlehem, PA

Heating System

  • (7) Cambridge Space Heaters
  • Thru wall mounting
  • 11,300 MBH total
  • 63,500 CFM total
  • 43.5 HP total - intermittent

Direct Fired Recirculation 

Operating Costs

Based on 5,750 Heating Degree Days @ 65°
$0.23/ft2 Gas cost @ $1.00/therm
$0.16/ft2 Electric cost @ $0.08/kWh

$0.39/ft2 Total cost

Building Specifications

  • R-19 Roof / R-19/R-2 Walls
  • 361,200 ft2 x 40’ high
  • 56 doors
  • Located in Dayton, Ohio

Heating System

  • (2) Direct-fired Recirculation Heaters
  • Roof top mounting
  • 8,250 MBH total
  • 210,000 CFM total (.87 AT/Hr)
  • 150 HP total  - continuous

Summary

The Cambridge system used 51% less total energy with more even temperatures. If the 361,200 ft2 facility had installed a Cambridge system they could have saved approximately $72,000/year operating at $0.19/ft2  vs. $0.39/ft2.